Lack of association between endocrine disrupting chemicals and male fertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Environmental research. 2023;217:114942

Plain language summary

Exposure to natural or synthetic chemicals is directly related to environmental conditions, dietary and other lifestyle factors. Some of these chemicals are named endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) because of their capability to interfere with the endocrine system. The aim of this study was to summarise and explore the association between exposure to EDCs and human male fertility indicators. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven studies; 4 assessed bisphenol A (BPA) in urine and sperm quality parameters, while 3 articles evaluated PCB153 [polychlorinated biphenyls] in serum and sperm quality parameters. Results show that there weren’t any positive or inverse associations between BPA or PCB153 and the sperm parameters analysed. Authors conclude that the systematic review showed a high disparity between studies, making difficult a consensus on the possible detrimental effect of the 12 groups of EDCs on male fertility. Thus, no conclusive statements can be drawn. Further studies are needed in order to provide more robust data.

Abstract

The incidence of infertility currently affects about 15% of the world's population. Male factors are estimated to be responsible for up to 40-50% of these cases. While the cause of these reproductive disorders is still unclear, the exposure to a family of ubiquitous compounds in our daily life, named endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) could be involved. This paper was aimed at performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies exploring whether human male exposure to EDCs affects male fertility. Clinical and observational studies assessing the exposure to EDCs along with sperm quality, the most common reproductive disorders, sperm DNA damage, sperm oxidative stress, fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and miscarriage rate were included. The quality assessment tool from the NHLBI-NIH was used to assure that studies met standardized quality criteria. Sensitivity analysis and heterogeneity among studies was assessed. Overall, the 32 selected articles, including 7825 individuals in the systematic review, explored 12 families of EDCs. The results revealed a high heterogeneity among studies in relation to the association between exposure to EDCs and the endpoints analyzed. Meta-analyses were performed with data from 7 articles including 479 individuals, 4 articles assessing the association between BPA in urine and sperm quality, and 3 articles evaluating PCB153 in serum and sperm quality. In the meta-analysis, we identified an unpredicted significant positive association between PCB153 exposure and sperm concentration. However, it would not be clinically relevant. No positive or inverse associations were found neither for BPA, nor for PCB153 and the rest of sperm parameters analyzed. The high disparity between studies made difficult to draw conclusions on the potential harmful effects of EDCs on male fertility. Consequently, to delineate the potential relationship that EDCs can have on male fertility, an important condition stressing the health system, further investigations are required.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Hormonal
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Male fertility
Environmental Inputs : Xenobiotics
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Environment
Functional Laboratory Testing : Not applicable
Bioactive Substances : Polychlorinated biphenyls ; PCB153 ; Bisphenol A

Methodological quality

Jadad score : Not applicable
Allocation concealment : Not applicable

Metadata